AI & MCP Guide

AI / IMM / MCP

Connect AI to
evidence-based impact management

Bring your preferred AI assistant together with structured impact data, established assessment methods and repeatable IMM workflows.

AI adoption is rising. Embedding it in workflows is harder.

AI is now commonplace in impact practice, but its use is less established in specific workflows such as data analysis, implementation and ongoing monitoring.

AI in impact practice

98%Use generative AI at workSIMI 2026 / N=42

In SIMI’s survey of 42 impact and evaluation practitioners, nearly 98% used generative AI at work. Usage is more widespread in planning and reporting than in day-to-day monitoring.

Widespread AI use has yet to translate into routine IMM workflows

Share using AI at specific stages of impact practice (SIMI 2026; N=42).

AI used in specific IMM workflows

General AI use (about 98%) is more widespread than AI use at individual stages of IMM. Connecting AI to recurring evidence collection and monitoring remains a practical gap.

AI × IMM

Accumulated domain expertise × AI flexibility

impactlake™ goes beyond a standalone AI tool. It combines data, assessment models and operational processes developed through IMM practice with the flexibility of AI, making exploration broader and everyday use easier.

Comparison dimensionGeneral-purpose AI aloneimpactlake™: domain foundation × AIConventional systems alone
Early-stage explorationExplore and organize ideas flexibly in natural languageExplore with AI and convert findings into structured outputsStart with predefined forms and settings
KPIs and evaluation methodsCan suggest options, but definitions and evidence require checkingUse referenced information and methods while maintaining evaluation modelsUse preset indicators and formulas reliably
Ongoing managementOften stays within individual conversations and filesCombine AI flexibility with continuous records and reuseMake it easier to manage actuals, history and responsibilities
Organizational processesOften depends on individual prompts and human checksDefine where AI is used and reviewed, then embed it in workflowsDefine approval and operational procedures
Updating and sharing informationInformation often needs reorganizing by project or conversationReuse information for analysis by different usersUse managed, consistent data

This comparison reflects typical use patterns. Actual capabilities depend on the AI model, system architecture and operations.

UTILIZE IMM

Ground AI workflows in trusted impact data

We combine datasets, methods and assessment models developed since 2022 with designs for responsible AI use. The goal is not simply to generate an answer, but to make it usable in later operations.

Structured impact data

Explore societal challenges, KPIs, public statistics, assessment and calculation methods, and reference cases.

Connected models, metrics and evidence

Link logic models, indicators, calculations, evidence and performance results so that outputs remain usable.

Traceable, evidence-backed AI workflows

Use retrieval-augmented approaches such as RAG to reference data and documents. Combine sourced information with human judgment rather than relying solely on generation.

Human review and appropriate access

Separate AI drafting, structuring and calculation, and human review, then design their use to meet organizational and information-management needs.

01Refer to data and evidenceChallenges, indicators, statistics and methods
02Explore with AIHypotheses, options and questions
03Structure and recordModels, formulas and actual results
04Review and reuseDecisions, monitoring and reporting

Use impactlake™ from your AI assistant

Choose the AI tool you use and enter what you would like to explore. You can also start with an example question below.

An initial MCP connection is required once.
Connection guidesChatGPT ↗Claude ↗
Other AI services, including Gemini, are planned for future support. For details, contact us.

From AI-assisted analysis to ongoing IMM

Combining AI with a data foundation can support parts of work traditionally requiring specialist expertise. Our goal is to help more people participate in and sustain impact exploration, measurement and improvement.

Make impact exploration more accessible

Identifying relevant issues and indicators depends on specialist support

Ask in natural language and explore relevant cases, KPIs and evidence

Business and investment teams can develop hypotheses for expert review

Accelerate impact assessment design

Document review and indicator research are repeated for every project

Build an initial assessment using existing models and calculation methods

Spend more time validating assumptions and reuse structured models

Support continuous monitoring

Plans, results and assumptions are scattered across files and people

Manage KPIs, formulas, evidence and update histories in one structure

Make performance reviews and improvement part of routine work

Inform action and investment decisions

Assessments often end once a report has been prepared

Reuse the same information for investment, business management and IR

Support decisions, operational improvement and stakeholder dialogue

Put AI to work throughout the IMM lifecycle

Start exploring through the AI you already use. Contact us about specific integrations and organizational deployment.

Scroll to top