Impactfully Unlock Your Impact.
Connect theories of change, KPIs, measurement data, impact estimates, monitoring and stakeholder reporting in one continuous workflow.
CORE IMM
Start with existing materials, then connect planning, measurement, assessment and reporting without rebuilding the same information at every step.
Organize societal challenges, beneficiaries, business activities and expected changes. Refer to issue maps and public models to define the impacts to assess.
Import existing business materials and logic models, then edit pathways from activities to outcomes and impacts.
Find measures relevant to your business and desired outcomes, then define units, targets and data collection methods.
Collect values required for KPIs and assessment models from external databases, spreadsheets, CSV files and surveys. Bring data input and updates into routine operations.
Available collection and integration options depend on the plan and deployment environment.
Use logic models and KPIs to connect formulas, assumptions and statistics for assessment and estimation.
Update models and indicators across years, businesses and departments. Manage KPI results, assessments and improvement questions over time.
Use managed information to draft reports and web content for investors, financial institutions and internal audiences.
WORKFLOW
Guide the required information and next steps based on organizational maturity, from initial impact mapping to ongoing monitoring and systematic IMM suitable for external communication and review. Design responsibilities, permissions, evidence, reviews and approval steps around organizational policies, taking account of frameworks relevant to international assessments such as B Corp and BlueMark.
Define business scope, stakeholders, existing materials and assessment objectives.
Organize models, indicators, methods, evidence and data collection.
Track responsibilities, approval points, change history and decision rationale.
Connect monitoring, reporting, improvement and the next planning cycle.
Four common gaps in IMM, the features that address them, and what improves in day-to-day work.
| Current challenge | Relevant capabilities | What changes |
|---|---|---|
| 01Impact assumptions are fragmented | Link stakeholders, intended outcomes and causal pathways in a shared theory of change. | Teams can review the same assumptions and keep track of what changes. |
| 02Monitoring is disconnected from delivery | Connect KPIs and measurement methods to surveys, spreadsheets and reference datasets. | Teams can update evidence and track outcomes as part of regular operations. |
| 03Evidence rarely informs decisions | Bring targets, actuals, assumptions and supporting evidence into a reviewable workflow. | Findings inform decisions, corrective actions and follow-up. |
| 04Lessons get lost between reporting cycles | Maintain models, metrics, results and change histories in one structured record. | Build the next plan on the evidence and lessons from the last one. |
For setup and enterprise adoption, see Plans and implementation.
From trying individual capabilities to organization-wide adoption, we can discuss the approach that fits your needs.